Sunday, December 11, 2016

Nocturnal Animals


Nocturnal Animals (2016)
Dir. Tom Ford

A writer, Edward Sheffield (Jake Gyllenhaal), sends his former wife, art curator Susan Morrow (Amy Adams), a manuscript of his new novel entitled Nocturnal Animals. The novel’s plot is an integral part of the film and it makes a profound effect on Susan making this film an example of psychological revenge through literary art.

***Warning! Spoilers abound!***

I’ve read reviews of this film; most are very positive. However, among the negative, I get a sense that these reviewers are unfamiliar with the noir/neo-noir genre. I truly believe one needs to be well attuned to the characteristics of film noir to understand its storytelling techniques and the ambiguity that it entails (most negating critics were disappointed by the ending, which, to me, made sense).

Nocturnal Animals has three different narratives. There are the two stories (past and present) in the real world and one in the fictional world. As Susan reads her ex-husband’s novel, we are taken into that fictional world. These two worlds seem to parallel each other making the novel an allegory for their failed marriage.

I was very impressed with Gyllenhaal’s performance and Michael Shannon’s portrayal of a disenchanted sheriff deputy was magnificent. I was most intrigued by the fictional world in its cinematography and the acting.

Not counting the non-applicable item #10, the film meets 15/15 of the characteristics; thus making this film a true neo-noir.

Characteristics borrowed from film noir to define neo-noir and modern neo-noir:

1. Chiaroscuro for black and white films, intense or muted color in movies filmed in color.
Yes. There are many scenes where we see a pale Susan often surrounded in darkness. There is also stark black/white contrast with minimal pops of color.

2. Flashbacks
Yes. Susan reflects on her failed marriage to Edward.

3. Unusual narration
Definitely. We have parallel plots of the real world and the fictional world (as written in Sheffield’s novel).

4. Crime/planning a crime
Yes. Within the fictional world, Tony Hastings (also played by Gyllenhaal) pursues a trio of criminals responsible for his wife and daughter’s rape and murder. He colludes with local deputy sheriff Bobby Andes (brilliantly portrayed by Michael Shannon) to enact Texas justice on the trio.

5. Femme fatale and/or homme fatale
Yes. I see Susan as a femme fatale on two levels. One: her betrayal of her former husband and the pain she caused him. Two: the choices she’s made have also harmed her.

6. The instrument of fate
Yes; the novel. I would say the novel has impacted Susan greatly forcing her to evaluate her life and accept responsibility for her actions.

7. Angst (for example, guilt, fear, self-doubt, confusion, and so on; in other words, anything that contributes to angst).
Yes for several characters.
In the real world, Susan is often consumed with guilt and self-doubt. Edward is consumed with emotional pain and penning his novel has been quite cathartic for him.

In the fictional world, Tony is wrought with guilt over the brutal slaying of his family. He sees himself as a failed protector. Dep. Bobby Andes is filled with angst against his department and failed justice.

8. Violence or the threat of violence
Yes. In the fictional world, a trio of outlaws terrorizes the Hastings family before they rape and murder the wife and daughter. Dep. Andes and Tony embark on revenge of the trio with plans to take matters into their own hands.

9. Urban and nighttime settings
Yes. In the real world, the present day setting is Los Angeles with lots of nighttime shots. The flashbacks are set in New York and exclusively nighttime.

In the fictional world, the setting is West Texas. It begins with a night setting with the requisite shots of the lonely highway. However, the rest of the story has a “soleil noir” effect. The scenes are reminiscent of Bad Day at Black Rock.

10. Allusion to post–World War II (or any postwar) themes (optional)
n/a

11. Philosophical themes (existentialism in particular) involving alienation, loneliness
Yes. In the real world, Susan is consumed with guilt in a loveless second marriage. The feeling of loneliness is highlighted by her solo onscreen shots in darkness or in expansive settings making her a miniscule person.

During her flashback scenes, Susan is obsessed with status but falls for a “romantic” man (in the literary sense) and she is conflicted. She also comes to the realization that she is much like her mother, whom she tries to avoid becoming.

In the fictional world, Tony is emotionally fragile and laments his failure as the protective husband and father. His duty to his family is now to bring their murderers to justice.

12. Psychology (hypnosis, brainwashing, manipulation, amnesia)
Yes; it is the basis of this film. The point of the novel is an act of psychological revenge against the former spouse. This fact is highlighted in the film’s closing scene.

13. Greed
Yes. Susan is consumed with having high status as highlighted by her career choice and the decision to leave her first husband.

14. Betrayal
Yes. Susan betrayed her first husband twice. The first act was her extra-marital affair. The second act I will withhold as I feel it confirms the novel as an allegory for Susan and Edward’s marriage.

15. No stark contrast between “good” and “evil” (characters, forces, emotion, and so on)
Maybe. It is pretty clear who the “good” and “evil” characters are. However, a viewer could question Dep. Andes’s character. He does make choices that would be considered illegal under the rule of due process.

16. Expertise triumphs, perhaps rather than “good”
Yes. In the real world, I feel that Edward is triumphant with his novel’s publication; although the impact on Susan may be more bittersweet.

In the fictional world, Dep. Andes’s expertise and influence on Tony can be considered triumphant but it comes with consequences.

Tuesday, May 31, 2016

The Nice Guys

The Nice Guys
Directed by Shane Black

This film stars Russell Crowe (Healy) and Ryan Gosling (March) as a hired strong man and private detective (respectively). The two work together to investigate the deaths of a porn star and her associates as well as a possible cover up of political corruption. In doing so, their own lives are threatened; the more they uncover, the higher the body count. The film is set in 1977 Los Angeles during the energy crisis. In all its seriousness, the film maintains a comedic element as the two protagonists (who start off as bitter enemies) grow closer together and develop a professional relationship.

1. Chiaroscuro for black and white films, intense or muted color in movies filmed in color.
Yes – Some scenes have muted color set against a black background particularly when Healy has a moment of introspective thought.

2. Flashbacks
Yes – There were a few scenes delving into a Healy’s past.

3. Unusual narration
Yes – March has a rather bizarre dream sequence.

4. Crime/planning a crime (usually—but not always—murder)
Yes – We have murder, pornography, revenge, and political gain.

5. Femme fatale and/or homme fatale
Yes – I would say there are 3 femme fatales were double crossing is apparent and one homme fatale who is the threat.

6. The instrument of fate
Yes – The reel of pornographic film.

7. Angst (for example, guilt, fear, self-doubt, confusion, and so on; in other words, anything that contributes to angst)
Yes – Especially from the daughter of a U.S. Justice.

8. Violence or the threat of violence
Yes – there is a mounting body count as well as severe injury.

9. Urban and nighttime settings
Yes – many nighttime scenes with the setting 1977 Los Angeles.

10. Allusion to post–World War II (or any postwar) themes (optional)
Maybe – March often makes references to Hitler when criticizing others’ behavior that he finds inappropriate. This is also post-Vietnam War and the energy crisis that has some correlation to the political theme in this film.

11. Philosophical themes (existentialism in particular) involving alienation, loneliness
Yes – The loss of March’s wife and his daughter’s constant criticism of his work. March's daughter also is the moral compass for both him and Healy. For Healy, there seems to be some self-doubt.

12. Psychology (hypnosis, brainwashing, manipulation, amnesia)
Yes – manipulation particularly Basinger’s character as well as her minion who double crosses March and Healy

13. Greed
Always – we have the auto industry in cahoots with the U.S. Justice Dept. for a massive cover-up. March is also a bit sleazy on how he milks his clients for more money.

14. Betrayal
Yes – Lots of double crossing.

15. No stark contrast between “good” and “evil” (characters, forces, emotion, and so on)
Yes – March tends to waver between good and bad (not so much evil). The character of Amelia is also dichotomous (as well as extremely annoying). Healy is a hired strong arm but again more good and bad and less evil.

16. Expertise triumphs, perhaps rather than “good”
Yes – It’s March's expertise that triumphs with some rather questionable ethics in getting to the truth of the matter.

Monday, March 28, 2016

2 Guns


2 Guns
Directed by Baltasar Kormakur


I just happened upon this film. I was pleasantly surprised to see that it had many elements of a neo-noir; 15/16 In a way, it kind of reminded me a bit of a classic Tarantino film mixed with Breaking Bad. It's the story of an undercover DEA agent who is partnered with an undercover Navy officer (unbeknownst to each other) to infiltrate a drug cartel. They stake out and rob a bank expecting only $3 million only to find that the total take was over $43 million. It sets in motion a wild chase where four-five different groups are after the funds. The film is also peppered with witty, comedic elements. 

1. Chiaroscuro for black and white films, intense or muted color in movies filmed in color (In either black and white or color, the technique is used to enhance the mood and/or the emotional content.)
Yes. It's a color film but there is definitely some muted colors that create the chiaroscuro. I've also noticed the heavy use of  dark brown/white.

2. Flashbacks
Yes. There is a scene where we are at the present, yet it does flash back to a few weeks earlier. Afterward, the film remains linear.

3. Unusual narration
Yes. The plot is multi-faceted showing different perspectives and granting equal screen time to each perspective.

4. Crime/planning a crime (usually—but not always—murder)
Lots of crime and lots of murder. It starts off with a drug deal, followed by a bank heist. Four different groups are after the money claiming their rightful ownership of the funds and the body count increases.

5. Femme fatale and/or homme fatale
Yes on both. One former girlfriend and double-crossing friends

6. The instrument of fate
Yes. The bank heist was supposed to be a collection of a mere $3million but they end up with $43.125 million much to their surprise and confusion. Also, our protagonist has a chance encounter with his ex-girlfriend at a hotel. We learn, later, that it answers all the questions near the film's end. 

7. Angst (for example, guilt, fear, self-doubt, confusion, and so on; in other words, anything that contributes to angst)
Yes for two main protagonists. They have a heightened distrust of each other and for good reason.

8. Violence or the threat of violence
Yes. Russian Roulette. Blackmail. Bank Heist. Mexican Standoffs. People getting shot (including innocents). 

9. Urban and nighttime settings
Yes and no. Lots of nighttime settings but not urban. Most of the action is either the Sonoran desert or Texas.

10. Allusion to post–World War II (or any postwar) themes (optional)
n/a

11. Philosophical themes (existentialism in particular) involving alienation, loneliness
This sort of relates to question 7. The two protagonists often engage in discussion about trust, friendship and brotherhood.

12. Psychology (hypnosis, brainwashing, manipulation, amnesia)
Yes. Manipulation.

13. Greed
Definitely Yes. Four different groups are after the $43.125 million; the DEA, the Navy, the CIA and the Mexican drug lord.

14. Betrayal
Yes. We have not only double crossing but also triple and quadruple crossing.

15. No stark contrast between “good” and “evil” (characters, forces, emotion, and so on)
None whatsoever. The good are bad and the bad are evil.

16. Expertise triumphs, perhaps rather than “good”
Indeed it does. It all boils down to who has the greater forethought and expertise to whoever ultimately walks away with the cash.


Friday, February 12, 2016

Noir City 14: Art of Darkness



For most people, the new year represents new beginnings, a clear palette, and a fresh start. For me, a descent into darkness. That's right, it's Noir City 14 when the Film Noir Foundation descends upon the city of San Francisco for the annual festival. This year's theme was Art, Madness, and Murder; a collection of 25 films "exploring the pressures, pitfalls, paranoia and pain [you just have to admire the alliteration] of being an artist in an indifferent and often cruel world." (noircity.com)

Artists consisted of photographers, painters, dancers, musicians, et. al. with each night dedicated to that specific talent. Due to my work schedule (and other commitments), I was only able to attend night one: Photographers. 



It's often debated whether or not Rear Window is a noir considering the lack of a femme fatale and its color production. Voyeurism has always been a prominent theme in films noir; after all, isn't that what a detective does? Lurking about spying on his/her subject? Of course this is a film noir! It also has several elements of noir artistry such as the muted color for that stark contrast, the extreme camera angles (and in this case: the dolly zoom), strong female rolls, and the urban setting. This is among Alfred Hitchcock's finest works and my all time favorite. 


The second film was a departure from the classic film noir showcase. I can't think of any other time when Noir City showed a modern noir, but 1992 film The Public Eye made the bill. In this film, Joe Pesci stars as Leon "Bernzy" Bernstein; a freelance crime and street photographer for the New York City tabloidsThe character of Bernzy is loosely based on NY Daily News photographer Weegee, and some of his photos appear in this film. 
With a police radio under the dashboard of his car and a makeshift darkroom in his trunk, Bernzy quickly races to the scene of horrific crimes and accidents in order to snap exclusive photographs before meeting femme fatale Kay Levitz, a recently widowed nightclub owner who asks him to investigate a man who has been hassling her. This seems to be a common arch-type in Neo-Noir films. 2014's Nightcrawler definitely has these elements.

Between films, the Film Noir Foundation featured a photo slide of past Noir City festivals. Imagine my surprise when I saw my image on the big screen. That photo was from (I believe) Noir City 12.


Lest I forget: My femme fatale attire. This year, I wore a 1930s evening dress, black vintage gloves and fascinator. The heels are from American Duchess, and I have been wanting to wear these Noire heels since its pre-sale. It was the perfect complement to my attire.



Sunday, January 10, 2016

Bullitt

Since the end of my "Investigating Film Noir" course, a few former students have decided to continue this investigation specific to Neo-Noir. How it is defined is up to much speculation and debate; however, one person composited a list of qualities to help determine what constitutes a true Neo-Noir film. I'm very much a scholar of the classics, but I've decided to delve into the world of Neo-Noir. My first review follows:


Bullitt (1968)
Directed by Peter Yates
Bullitt_poster.jpg

Really Brief Overview
A San Francisco district attorney, who is also an ambitious politician, has a "star witness" who is about to testify in a Senate Subcommittee hearing on organized crime. He puts The SFPD, specifically Frank Bullitt, in charge of protective custody for 40 hours until his court appearance. 

Analysis
Bullitt gets 12 out of 16. Usually when films noir are based off police procedure and investigation there may be fewer items to check off on the list below. What seemed to stand out most for me was Steve McQueen's eyes. They're a character within the character. We want to see what he sees; we need to know. And it's usually this monitoring that advances the plot.

The cinematography is on point with traditional film noir, not only with the chiaroscuro but also the camera angles. The one scene I liked best was McQueen at a high society party; the angle is looking up from the floor and our protagonist is framed by the legs of female patrons standing around (nothing sexual. It's like being a small child or a pet that sees nothing but legs in their line of vision).

The San Francisco Bay Area is also prominently featured throughout the film. There are no closed (studio) sets. Some locations include SFO; San Francisco's Mission District, North Beach, Downtown, Embarcadero, Russian Hill, Marina District; Guadalupe Parkway in Brisbane; Sausalito. Side note: The taxi driver (played by Robert Duvall) says that the suspect made a long distance call...to San Mateo. It's only 15 miles away. I just started laughing.

My only negative was the car chase scene (which is what Bullitt is praised for). Be forewarned. You WILL get dizzy. We see them pass the same green VW Beetle at least 5 times. And it's geographically impossible to make that chase. How does one get from Mission District to North Beach in mere seconds? But I'm a native, so no one outside of SF would probably care. 

What I really liked about this film was the jazz score. It also contains live performances by local jazz musicians to create realism.

1. Chiaroscuro for black and white films, intense or muted color in movies filmed in color (In either black and white or color, the technique is used to enhance the mood and/or the emotional content.)
Yes; muted color in some scenes.

2. Flashbacks 
No, but this is an investigation where Bullitt has to continuously backtrack and interview witnesses, but the scenes stay in real time.

3. Unusual narration 
No

4. Crime/planning a crime (usually—but not always—murder) 
Yes; stalking, murder, the car chase

5. Femme fatale and/or homme fatale
I'll say yes. I definitely see the DA as homme fatale as well as the witness because his actions do result in the deaths of innocent victims.

6. The instrument of fate 
I would say YES. Particularly during the investigation where one major question is answered.

7. Angst (for example, guilt, fear, self-doubt, confusion, and so on; in other words, anything that contributes to angst)
Yes, the title character seems to work on his own accord with little regard to what his superiors think.

8. Violence or the threat of violence 
Yes. We have a "protected witness" whose life is in danger.

9. Urban and nighttime settings 
Yes...my hometown of San Francisco. Night time settings during film's climax as well as more high tension scenes.

10. Allusion to post–World War II (or any postwar) themes (optional) 
No.

11. Philosophical themes (existentialism in particular) involving alienation, loneliness 
Yes; particularly in the scene between Bullitt and his girlfriend as she is questioning the man she "thought she knew".

12. Psychology (hypnosis, brainwashing, manipulation, amnesia) 
Yes, of course. It's politicians, DAs, and police officers. It's in their nature to be masters of manipulation.

13. Greed 
Yes. The DA in the film has a clear agenda that best serve his interests.

14. Betrayal
Yes. DA feels betrayed by Bullitt, The state's witness betrays the DA.

15. No stark contrast between “good” and “evil” (characters, forces, emotion, and so on) 
No. The lines are pretty clear. HOWEVER, Bullitt does break procedure (if not making quite illegal decisions) to move the investigation forward.

16. Expertise triumphs, perhaps rather than “good” 
Yes.

Friday, November 27, 2015

The Heist



"Timing is everything."

In all heist films, time is the key factor in pulling off a successful heist. However, NOTHING ever goes according to plan as is evident not only in heist films but also in life. I teach literature at a local college. I have mapped out everything for myself and students. Of course, there are always changes as the quarter progresses, and I find that my plans are always crossed out, reorganized, rescheduled, etc. So when going into a heist film, expect failure.

 Someone mentioned that the heist itself is a MacGuffin. I couldn't agree more. It's not so much the time that is important, but human frailties. Usually the most minute act is the one domino that pushes all others and advances the plot into a tailspin. Other times it's just a bad decision. Additionally, it's the planning and the character backgrounds that makes the plot that more interesting. These criminals are not your street thieves; they have families, live normal lives, they're highly intelligent. They just prefer to work outside the scope of the law. They also have a moral code. Generally, they don't take innocent lives. I keep thinking about Reservoir Dogs when Mr. Pink and Mr. White converse about killing people

• Mr. Pink: Did you kill anybody?
• Mr. White: A few cops.
• Mr. Pink: No real people?
• Mr. White: Just cops.

I also consider Heat when DeNiro and his crew are irate at the one psychopath (Slick) who needlessly killed an armor truck driver. Contrast this with law enforcement, they are usually portrayed as careless with very little moral values. I think most of the time, how films noir negatively portray law enforcement is usually quite accurate. I may be a little bias here, but I have a high distrust of law enforcement (even my uncles who were corrections officers and a sheriff who lived across the street from me had nothing but disdain for city police). But I digress... Generally, the heist film is more a look at the human condition than the heist act itself. It's also an observation of human response when nothing goes according to plan.

To be continued...